Message from @Der Jäger
Discord ID: 421375780879204363
Ernst Rohm wanted immediate confiscation of all private property
Hitler refused to do it
while Hitler was right in the SHORT TERM, Rohm was definately right in the LONG TERM
For some reason I thought they were connected in some way with the rise of the Nazi party
Don’t recall where I heard that
Hitler was afraid the German Army would manage to overhtrow the Nazis
and he didnt want to antagonize them until he had solidified his support with them
Had Rohm had his way, every Banker would have been shot
which was in retrosepct the right way
So yeah I was reading about how Hitler nationalized some industry
Rohm was more Communistic, Hitler was more Controlled Capitalism
But let other companies stay private owned
Hitler didnt even nationalize most of the German Economy till 1944
he should have done it earlier, but he didnt
There’s downsides to each approach
It’s amazing in hindsight
I will ask a question from American History
Why do you think it benefitted the Kikes more to Kill Lincoln following the Civil War?
To see that the Germans could have indeed won the war if not for the main issue
its very simple
You have to prevent lawsuits against land confiscation and if the defendent is dead
there can be no case, that is one
another is if the abuse of power works its way through a working court system alot of nasty things get exposed and you risk impeachment trials and all sorts of madness financial isntability
another one is if you kill the leader, you can rest all control in the hands of the legislature and the courts
Like in Ancient Rome the Dictator would only serve during the emergency then he was to return power to the Senate
Ah ok that makes perfect sense
Another one is the idea of Martyrdom
Do you have a degree in history lol
Cause you know alot
You can take an illegal war, cover it in Martyrdom and make it look good
then you can create a pantheon of heroes
and manipulate the narrative
no i dont have a degree
See i studied it for years trying to understand the American Civil War.
Why would you kill a President when there is absolutely no way it can help your side achieve victory?
The answer has to be yes it was to provide a victory of another kind
NAMELY SCHLOMOS VICTORY
When the answer is unclear
Name the Jew
it always works