the family name was originally Botha, they were Spanish money changers who had fled Spain via Portugal to England

in the late 1600s

Martyrdom can cover a multitude of sins

the Jews use Martyrs in this way, its a very important tactic

JFK couldn't push through all the Jews Civil RIghts and Open Immigration BS, but Lyndon Johnson who was Southron could FORCE the Southern Legislators to go along with it, it was a win-win

Killing Bobby Kennedy and MLK was also important as it allowed the Jews to take direct control of the conversation, plus the fact of JFK's opposing Nuclear israel

though they supported Israel

The Jews murdered George Lincoln Rockwell for another reason. They couldn't allow an IVY-LEAGUE EDUCATED WWII Veteran who could speak on their level oppose them with facts

It is more important for Jewry to wrest power in Courts and Committes than in leaders

What was the role of Rothschild in WW2?

The Rothschilds were largely with the Allies, although they still did maintain some Axis investments through back channels

they got paid either way

For some reason Adofl HItler didnt confiscate and nationalize the banks as he should have done immediately in fact he let them operate for some time afrer seizing power

Ernst Rohm wanted immediate confiscation of all private property

Hitler refused to do it

while Hitler was right in the SHORT TERM, Rohm was definately right in the LONG TERM

For some reason I thought they were connected in some way with the rise of the Nazi party

Don’t recall where I heard that

Hitler was afraid the German Army would manage to overhtrow the Nazis

and he didnt want to antagonize them until he had solidified his support with them

Had Rohm had his way, every Banker would have been shot

which was in retrosepct the right way

So yeah I was reading about how Hitler nationalized some industry

Rohm was more Communistic, Hitler was more Controlled Capitalism

But let other companies stay private owned

Hitler didnt even nationalize most of the German Economy till 1944

he should have done it earlier, but he didnt

There’s downsides to each approach

It’s amazing in hindsight

I will ask a question from American History

Why do you think it benefitted the Kikes more to Kill Lincoln following the Civil War?

To see that the Germans could have indeed won the war if not for the main issue

its very simple

Ok hmm 🤔

You have to prevent lawsuits against land confiscation and if the defendent is dead

there can be no case, that is one

another is if the abuse of power works its way through a working court system alot of nasty things get exposed and you risk impeachment trials and all sorts of madness financial isntability

another one is if you kill the leader, you can rest all control in the hands of the legislature and the courts

Like in Ancient Rome the Dictator would only serve during the emergency then he was to return power to the Senate

Ah ok that makes perfect sense

Another one is the idea of Martyrdom