For some reason Adofl HItler didnt confiscate and nationalize the banks as he should have done immediately in fact he let them operate for some time afrer seizing power

Ernst Rohm wanted immediate confiscation of all private property

Hitler refused to do it

while Hitler was right in the SHORT TERM, Rohm was definately right in the LONG TERM

For some reason I thought they were connected in some way with the rise of the Nazi party

Don’t recall where I heard that

Hitler was afraid the German Army would manage to overhtrow the Nazis

and he didnt want to antagonize them until he had solidified his support with them

Had Rohm had his way, every Banker would have been shot

which was in retrosepct the right way

So yeah I was reading about how Hitler nationalized some industry

Rohm was more Communistic, Hitler was more Controlled Capitalism

But let other companies stay private owned

Hitler didnt even nationalize most of the German Economy till 1944

he should have done it earlier, but he didnt

There’s downsides to each approach

It’s amazing in hindsight

I will ask a question from American History

Why do you think it benefitted the Kikes more to Kill Lincoln following the Civil War?

To see that the Germans could have indeed won the war if not for the main issue

its very simple

Ok hmm 🤔

You have to prevent lawsuits against land confiscation and if the defendent is dead

there can be no case, that is one

another is if the abuse of power works its way through a working court system alot of nasty things get exposed and you risk impeachment trials and all sorts of madness financial isntability

another one is if you kill the leader, you can rest all control in the hands of the legislature and the courts

Like in Ancient Rome the Dictator would only serve during the emergency then he was to return power to the Senate

Ah ok that makes perfect sense

Another one is the idea of Martyrdom

Do you have a degree in history lol

Cause you know alot

You can take an illegal war, cover it in Martyrdom and make it look good

then you can create a pantheon of heroes

and manipulate the narrative

no i dont have a degree

See i studied it for years trying to understand the American Civil War.

Why would you kill a President when there is absolutely no way it can help your side achieve victory?

The answer has to be yes it was to provide a victory of another kind

NAMELY SCHLOMOS VICTORY

When the answer is unclear

Name the Jew