hehehe

t. Chariman Mao

*chairman

well everyone had that idea, but it did not work

from tito to mao

my problem with communism is that is just restructures the class system and creates a class of bureaucrats

they all became alienated from workers people, or workers people from them

pretty much that too

so, is solution some kind of soviets (council of workers?)

it fails to address the issue of alienation

I mean yeah

but we need one political party to implement that

forming a consensus doesn't fucking matter

Not sure if I understood, so still one party - vanaguard who will implement soviet councils?

well I agree with Marx

we need to transition into this framework

we can't just wake up tommorow and have this

we need to focus on empowering people and restructuring our system of production to have more vertically structured and ensure equal ownership of the means of production

on top of this people have to be educated

we need to show people that pooling our resources and cooperating

is the most effective means of managing them

but again the problem of the left

its hard to conceptualize the how

i think the most damaging thing is that everyone thinks communism is authoritarian and immediately dismisses it without even knowing what it is

tbh, that does not sound like anarchism to me, more like some kind of syndicalism and luxemburigsm 😛 I might be wrong tho

It isn't

tbh anarchy isn't without leadership

just unjustified hierarchy

there just isn't a justified reason why one party should be the "vanguard"

and it alienates people from political discourse

when we need to make it more accessible

you can't count on a system to self critique

you need people who are willing to disagree

and challenge something even if it seems stupid

otherwise we would never form new ideas

I agree, but disagree that this sounds like anarchism

😄

Please don't take me at 100% face value i'm not some political genius

I'm not gonna pretend my views aren't without some holes

my views are 100% infallible and if you disagree you are objectively incorrect am i right

it does make sense and history proves it (history of real socialisms)