Slavery is immoral

HUh?

@Anarchist-Communist Am I?

how

@Anarchist-Communist Tell me how.

@Deleted User yes you are.

My argument is that the economy of the North, which was based on manufacturing and thus automation, was dependent on the agricultural economy of the South which produced in demand textiles via slave labor.

@Anarchist-Communist Tell me how then.

@Deleted User Why should I? You're sea-lioning again, fuck you. I already proved you wrong.

@Deleted User

@Deleted User If I am correct, didn't automation BOOST slavery?

yes it did

I said that

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cotton_gin

the cotton gin is a fucking thing

That's such a shit argument bro

no it isn't

its directly linked to an increase in slaves

When you have the means of automation artificially raised

read the article

you have far less incentive to innovate

@Anarchist-Communist So you are giving up all logic, and are just saying "FUCK YOU I WIN!" Like a child? Geez man, when you act like that, I can only assume you have autism.

this is basic historical materialism

Production in the North increased on the eve of the Civil war and cotton prices rose drastically. Where is the slow down you speak of? And decreased competition? Where?

@Deleted User So you're confusion lies in misunderstanding

The slowdown is not even seeable

"Because of its inadvertent effect on American slavery, and on its ensuring that the South's economy developed in the direction of plantation-based agriculture (while encouraging the growth of the textile industry elsewhere, such as in the North), the invention of the cotton gin is frequently cited as one of the indirect causes of the American Civil War."

pulled right from the fucking article

In fact if it was seeable

iot would'nt exist

with 3 citations included

because their woudln't be slavery

@Deleted User Sea lioning (also spelled sealioning and sea-lioning) is a type of Internet trolling which consists of bad-faith requests for evidence, or repeated questions, the purpose of which is not clarification or elucidation, but rather an attempt to derail a discussion or to wear down the patience of one's opponent. The troll who uses this tactic also uses fake civility and feigns offense so as to discredit their target.[1][2][3][4] The term arises from a 2014 edition of the webcomic Wondermark, where a character expresses an unsubstantiated dislike of sea lions and a passing sea lion repeatedly asks the character to explain.[5][6][7][8]

You're a troll.

You're asking all of these questions to me in bad faith.

@Anarchist-Communist Do you actually have autism?

It wasn't "seeable"? What does that mean? And if it isn't quantifiable, why even mention it?

@Deleted User I mean i'd bascially have to explain economics and marxism from the ground up to you

@Deleted User you're not asking me for clarification, you want to keep me explaining over and over while ignoring all my points. You're a troll. I proved you wrong.

for you to get this at this point