IIRC, weren't the statues once painted? Or maybe they were way back, and then unpainted marble came into style? I can't recall.

I do remember that many of the statues we have are actually copies of the ancient ones

IDK, college art history was a while ago

yes they were painted

actualy they could paint holy shit

wew

its like chinks have never had that

why wouldn't they be able to paint?

greeks werent

Paintings prior to the camera were really incredible

greeks were lazy homos

chinks have never had such sculptures either

why is western art superior

white people

but asian higher iq

really makes ya think huh

(((iq)))

hmm ill try to find some chinese paintings from 1st century to copare

insect people have no soul, they wouldnt understand art

even niggers make better art than chinks

Japanese art is pretty great too, but all the good Japanese art is medieval or newer

music

japanese art is nice n all but its not on the same level

they dont aspire to the same perfection

its a different style

It's just a very different style. I've never tried making any of it, so I wouldn't know which is harder to do. I'd imagine western art is the harder one, because holy shit the lighting and movement and just wow, it's complex and amazing, but I don't really know.

hmm not necessarily first century too

but its not bad tbh better than shitty european medieval ""art""

Definitely

Has some things in common with medieval Euro art though

Better, because the clothing and lighting is much better, but it's very stiff and front-faced like medieval scenes are.

excuse me what

bosch is well into reneissance

debatable

no not at al

you have no clear cut off point for the middle ages

terracota army is third century bc so its impressive tbh tho I think greeks had better sculptures earlier

furthermore the early netherlandish painting school is separate from the renaissance

My PC died aa