people voted him

because

partially due to the ocmmunsit fialed urpoising

and they fialed becuase the material conditions were not poresetn for a revoltuon ot occur

sorry 4 typos cold fingers

Ah, so we are talking about two seperate things. A failure is still an energetic crash which is why Fascism exists in first world.

fascism only existed in italy tho

and for a few years

it crashed

It's supposed to. And let's not get to pedantic. By fascist I mean authoritarian third position.

it failed in spain after like 3 years

well say corporatist

read abook

You say that a lot.

corportaism still failed in italy after a few yeras, spain in 3 years, germany in like 9 years or something

the best model of authoritarianism was nationalist communism

because it acutally put workers first

and wasn't a ploy by opportunist

Did you ignore what I just said and what I said from the beginning. 'Corporatism' is supposed to fail.

yeah i didn't scroll up

only saw below the tank video

The 'years in power' metric doesn't really mean anything if you can change the world in so few years.

That's the process.

Dialectics.

oh okay

tho third positionism has conditions in the middle east

like libya and syira have the conditions

not corporatism tho

Oh boy.

I am doing my best to accommodate your pedantic semantics but I think that was a mistake.

It wasn't a mistake, I think we had a good conversation

and it made me think you know

my semantics may be pedantic, but I just get anooyed by the over usage of terms by people who are unfamiliar with them

Of course.

Welcome to political theory.

okay gn

Talk to you next time.

I thought we just scratched the surface.

Silly surface scratchers.

Why do people insist that their side is better?

And insist that everything including fiction should revolve around their side?