Message from @Nicholas91
Discord ID: 419875401918185472
The point I was making is that a 20th century critique of identity under capitalism is no longer useful
And reductionist
you know i think national socialism worked out better than marxism-leninism, i mean....
@Deleted User 4 years verse 90
Cuba and NK still there
germans easily ravaged thru part of soviet union, and it took 4 major powers to defeat a state thats smaller than texas
That is some poor history
france, UK, USA, and USSR struggled with defeating NS germany, which is so weird
Yeah it didn't go quite like that in real life
China declared commitment to Marxism last year.
@Firefly btw, 12 years NS germany stood
@Deleted User whats this suppost to be
yup
@Deleted User I agree. Still there is no NS anywhere now and there is plenty of Marxism.
its basically because soviets couldnt give a fuck about people and they forcefully recruited people en masse, and basically thats why they rationed weapons on basis of: 1 gets the gun, other one gets the ammo.
Jesus christ
Thats just poor history
@Firefly there are no any NS because they're demonized daily
@Nicholas91 no, i've learned history
@Deleted User Marxism is demonized daily too.
Well why do you not know the basics even
Even from a right wing perspective
i guess its because marxists were partially against jews, i think @Firefly
Soviet production values were simply mind numbing; and its unthinkable that they would somehow be lacking in a robust number of personal weapons. Indeed so much Soviet small-arms fell into German hands in the initial assault that certain submachineguns and rifles were pressed into service with the Wehrmacht and given official Heer designations. @Deleted User
You are doing a poor job
@Deleted User Most Marxist in China and India never even heard about Jews.
@Deleted User um, thats not true, from 1930's to 1940's soviets were apsolutely lacking on weapons and ammo, and in mere 1942, they began putting less effort into gun detailing and they just crudely made weapons.
Again that's just not true.
um yeah it is
Even a nazi would know the truth of it
I mean i could pretend to be a nazi
as i said, soviets recruited people en masse in order to defeat nazis
and argue for you
The idea of underequipped front-line soldiers being 'herded' forwards with inadequate weaponry is a heady mix of misinterpreted first-hand accounts, propaganda, and lack of Soviet cohesion and tactical acumen during the years 1941-1942. Attacks, for example, that were meant to be well-planned and co-ordinated Soviet Doctrine attacks often got cluttered up, with successive waves attacking together, or with artillery falling too late or too early, giving the image of a rabble conducting a 'human wave' attack, which is a gross oversimplification.
You are just missing the basics so fundamentally
The Soviets were well equipped and they had a highly developed logistics system. You are an idiot.