No I never meant wage labour

Mr.E is confusing working 200 hours in a corporation for taking care of yourself.

Then you'd be fine with the abolition of capitalism for people to work in ways they see fit

for their own actualization

We are only responsible for feeding, clothing, and housing ourselves...that's how we evolve.

whether it be paint, intellectual pursuits,

or manual labor

I mean yeah some people need to work for a certain amount of time in order to acquire money to get food. It's rather that or hunt or farm for the food yourself.

Capitalism forces us to work 200 hours a week just to provide ourselves with the means to survive.

Not everything is going to be handed to you.

Sure it isnt

but people should choose to do that

as they would

And that's coming from a rich person too.

not be forced to

It's all manufactured slavery.

as a result of wage systems

but then again you'd have to abolish capitalism to give people a choice

Except they shouldnt because thats not how you evolve

No wage systems are successful

So...we evolve by being enslaved?

Nope

you're tying this to evolution when you have zero reason to.

You cant keep using that word as if it validates itself

We adapted to work

it does not.

Stop it.

Mr.E, you're beyond wrong on so many levels.

simply using derivatives of the word "evolution" doesn't give foundation to your claim >.>

No because it is evolution. You literally have to work in order for the species to survive

if the species did not work they wouldn't progress and I doubt we'd survive that long tbh

Except it isnt evolution, and you dont have to work a wage job.

But it is part of human evolution

So...we wouldn't survive if people stopped working 200 hours a week?

"proof"

No I never said 200 hours a week

I said we wouldnt survive if we didnt work at all

which isnt what anyone is proposing

Sorry, 40 hours a week...still...that's most of people's waking hours.

choice in occupation doesnt = "nobody works"

thats autism