When?

And then in doing so

For what? What context?

Mr.E is arguing just for the sake of it.

Created a false equivalency to my saying you do exactly what it was you were doing at that moment

Circular, self-mandated logic.

As if me pointing out you're ass at arguing, and then using what you are arguing at that very moment, somehow isnt proof

Again, what's the context

Scroll up

You're not giving any evidence

Except that I am

I dont need to scroll up I know what I say

Obviously you do

I gave you evidence of a false equivalency.

No you're not

You ignored it.

Yes, yes I am

And yes you did.

Okay give me the evidence then

Again, your use of the word assume and your equivalence to me saying every argument ever as being an assumption with no proof

Comparing insect behavior to human morality/ethics.

*again*

That's literally a demonstration

Of what I said

And I answered that

"Everything".

I don't need proof. I'm asking a question

But you didn't

That's not an answer.

You have yet to name one thing relevant about that.

And you made the assumption that what I was doing was assuming lmao

...or appropriate.

When did I use the word assume? What was the context?

You legit did what it was I was critiquing you for

Circular, self-mandated logic.

In response to what I was critiquing you for

Oh you mean I said you assumed.

Because you did

Only I didnt

He assessed.

I said every argument you've ever had