She was still allowed to say it

I can do that too.

Obviously not

She was punished

@fannybandit Thats because the only people I talk to are idiots.

Free speech is not protection from consequences

I'm confused

@Mr.E#2794 At least you can identify your peers.

Then dont complain about punching people and limiting their speech?

Like the fuck

@fannybandit Im not a commie

If you say something fascist and get punched then you're in accordance with your definition

You can now make a swimming pool in your kitchen

That you arent immune to consequences

I will because thats illegal

LOL

Its illegal cause it's illegal

assault is illegal

Yes

So then it's protected

It is

Pinching a nigga is in fact illegal

*punching

So then you agree with what I said prior

That it is limited

Seeing as how if I assault you over your speech

What'd you say I'm just joining in

I'll be punished for it

Once you punch me the argument of free speech is irrelevant I think

I'm conflicted to if it is or not. Because you are delusional and paranoid

You punching me was not speech

All I illustrated was that free speech isnt absolute

And that obviously consequences arise as a result of saying certain things

No but punching you in order to silence you isn't justifiable

You pretending that because sound is quicker than consequences it's somehow "absolute:

Absolute as in free speech isn't always a thing?

?

No

I'm literally saying

We make exceptions for what types of speech we deem appropriate

Or lawful