I'm saying hate speech is part of free speech

As a rule of thumb exceptions to everything exist

And that hate speech in the form of slander is already not part of free speech

Hence it being literally prosecutable

Yeah not part of your definition of free speech

And because their speech represents a literal threat to the speech of others

It should be punishable as well

And is under libel

Just not under Its own free standing law

Saying you dislike black people isn't a threat. Saying to kill them is.

Which they do

If I say "Im gonna bomb me school today" I'll prolly get arrested and charged terroristic threat

And don't get charged with hate speech

Some do. And they go to jail for it

They do

No they dont

Proof?

Again, every rally ever

Show me some rallys please

They literally stand for the persecution of a substantial group of people

So in that case my threat was an exception to the "rule" of "free speech"

And voice it vocal

Am I getting it?

And yes uwu

You get it

There are exceptions

Okay cool

To free speech

Yeah that makes sense

Okay show me. I've never seen someone say it

See, Its not complicated

in a rally atleast

Again, their existence as an organization is for the oppression of particular people's, There speech inherently advocates for the limiting of other people's speech

The only difference is it doesnt threaten capital

And therefore we dont have a law for it

Except we do.

No we dont

We do.

You even said we do.

No I brought up libel laws

You just said they don't get arrested and I asked for proof so now you're back tracking