Again, their existence as an organization is for the oppression of particular people's, There speech inherently advocates for the limiting of other people's speech

The only difference is it doesnt threaten capital

And therefore we dont have a law for it

Except we do.

No we dont

We do.

You even said we do.

No I brought up libel laws

You just said they don't get arrested and I asked for proof so now you're back tracking

We do have forms of limiting hate speech, But they dont exist in the contexts we're talking

I know your tactic

And I'm not backtracking at all

Learn to read

I said if I called Trump a nigger

I did

And that he ran a nigger business

No you didnt

It'd be covered under libel law

You never said that 😂

Not hate speech

I made an example to that effect

No you didnt

I think I said if I call him a fag

Yes I did

No you didnt

you said nothing about trump

that's for sure

or about fags or black people

I think that's just part of the example

"Something to that effect"

Not literal

You're legit wrong

I said it right there

Again.

Oh you mean while I was arguing with fanny

I'd be punished for libel

Didn't see that

I said it

Proof

So again