extreme example

but if half the means of production were publically owned

and the other half was privately owned

communism isnt just public property its a non-market economy

you cant fuse a market economy with a use-value economy lol

that wouldn't fall into communism or capitalism 🤔

it wouldnt be an inbetween is what i am saying

@herb for instance i would not say zimbabwe is capitalist

it is tho

i'm not saying it would be in between communism and capitalism

how is it not

i'm saying that it wouldn't fall into either category

Eclair - Today at 6:45 PM
communism requires all property to be owned by the populace
but in reality you can even have an in between situation

its just poor

no, the government took the property of people based on their skin color

@Deleted User i converted ti to a server for my political party

ah, I articulated my statement poorly

my apologies

it took back from colonialists

sure

I should have been more specific :D

http://nationalbolshevikfront.com/signup

fellas it's time

for the strasserists,falangists and nazbols to unite

and retake leftypol

sven <3

❤

@Brandod how is zimbawe not capitalistic

@herb because the answer ialready provided

because it took back something that was stolen from them?

by the state

have it back to private people

and capitalism needs a state

yes but since the state took people's property without needing to i would not call it capitalism

it took back property from white imperialist

and gave it back to the natives

that doenst make it not capitalism

its like saying the state foced me to give back something I stole from you

therefore it isnt capitalism

but not all the land was stolen

they only took the land of whites