Which just isnt true

They haven't solely helped the poor.

Ok

It's all trickle-down.

Thats a very different thing to say

It's the same thing I said earlier.

You just misunderstood my statement.

Yes.

Those tax credits gave the wealthy more power and the poor less power.

You just admitted its helped the poor, just not solelu

I will clarify everything that I'm saying in one sentence.

Not all tax credits are the same.

Dude

Government has yet to, in modern history, directly help the poor.

You cant just add contradictory statements

It's elaborating and clarifying, not contradicting.

Low income tax credits are added independently of others

It's all part of one movement.

Look i get what youre saying, but you have to admit that the statement you made about never helping the poor is wrong

Tax credits in general.

Never *solely* helping the poor is a different argument

Big business and wealthy people benefitted much more than low income families.

.

oof semantical arguments

Exchange solely for directly.

Theres no reason to talk about tax credits in general

Government has never made an effort to directly help the people.

I specifically said low income tax credits

You forget about the high income tax credits.

No i dont

It's all part of one movement/system.

But i only need to provide a counterexample to your argument

No, it isnt

If the wealthy, who are the problem, are getting more out of it than the people...that means it did not solely or directly benefit the people.

You can have tax credirs for low income without those for the wealthy, but politicians are bought by the wealthy

No shit.

That's my overall point.

Governments make many decisions, some can help the rich, some can help the poor, some help both, some screw both

Government is nothing more than an extension of the oppressing wealthy/ruling class.

And its not all one movement