Message from @fannybandit
Discord ID: 422125747759611916
They can.
And it does
Yet, they don't.
But not as much as it should
As much?
Idk why you like talking in absolutes
They do nothing to help the poor.
Well, i already gave you a very obvious example
Tax credits...those things that help the wealthy more.
But your argument was that it also helps others
Which enables them to oppress the people even more.
In the tax code, tax credits are specified separately
The more power and money the wealthy have, the less control the people have of their own lives.
That is true, but you said earlier that government never helped the poor
The system we have in place is corporate monarchy.
Which just isnt true
They haven't solely helped the poor.
Ok
It's all trickle-down.
Thats a very different thing to say
You just misunderstood my statement.
Yes.
Those tax credits gave the wealthy more power and the poor less power.
You just admitted its helped the poor, just not solelu
I will clarify everything that I'm saying in one sentence.
Not all tax credits are the same.
Dude
Government has yet to, in modern history, directly help the poor.
You cant just add contradictory statements
It's elaborating and clarifying, not contradicting.
Low income tax credits are added independently of others
It's all part of one movement.
Look i get what youre saying, but you have to admit that the statement you made about never helping the poor is wrong
Tax credits in general.
Never *solely* helping the poor is a different argument
Big business and wealthy people benefitted much more than low income families.
.
oof semantical arguments
Exchange solely for directly.