lol
he is already clearly seen as a pseudo intellectual from overuse of terms
And raping suspected gays
if u only have terms to describe your opinion then you have no opinion at all
you are just forming your opinion as a clone of another's
Bet
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homosexuality_in_ancient_Rome
It's not an adhominem
Or is that more college as research?
At worst a strawman
I mean, if you are for homosexuality I guess that is fine.
@Anarchist-Communist He's not fond of "modern American college theory studies".
sexuality isnt politics
But Roman Masculinity was probably not what you think. They also saw pants as uncivilized.
What
So @styles you better not be wearing pants! Pants are uncivilized!
Sexuality does influence politics
nice one dude
i didnt remember that arbitrary bullshit was at all relevant
That's spooky
Okay, then explain yourself. What do you mean by Roman Masculinity?
If it is not pantless and gay.
why dont u google it
wow
O shit
WWow!
oof
Well, not able to explain yourself?
Google murray bookchin
Okay. fair enough
u wanted a definition
i just gave u one
No, you told me to google.
The real man doesn't doubt his masculinity if he chooses to fuck trans men
ur too stupid to understand
I know more about Romans than you do.
You should be confident enough in your masculinity that it doesn't matter
Heck the male g spot is inside the ass
