Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 422518184042823681
And I doubt they will under socialism in the future.
@Deleted User >implying they didn't
>also implying it was a dictatorship of the proletariat
Yeah workers' councils staffed by good old boys isn't pro-demos
That's a hierarchy off the bat
Not of the regular prole
But of statesmen
Councillors rather
@Deleted User It was though. The DotP is synonymous with socialism. And you also don't understand what Soviet Democracy is. It's a form of Direct Democracy.
No it never was
It was representative at all points
If you even want to call it that
And only to appease the workers and revolutionaries
Who just got done suffering to place their desired leaders in power
In a Soviet democracy, voters are organized in basic units, for example the workers of a company, the inhabitants of a district, or the soldiers of a barracks. They directly send the delegates as public functionaries, which act as legislators, government and courts in one. In contrast to earlier democracy models according to Locke and Montesquieu, there is no division of powers. The councils are elected on several levels: At the residential and business level, delegates are sent to the local councils in plenary assemblies. These, in turn, can delegate members to the next level. The system of delegation continues to the Congress of Soviets at state level. The electoral processes thus take place from the bottom upwards. The levels are usually tied to administrative levels.
They would later "advance" society to capitalist industry and never really exit that stage
Market liberalization and the subsequent reintroduction of capitalist relations came about due to "de-Stalinization".
@Deleted User That's not even democracy that's the demos petitioning their leaders
Who are the archons of society
Democracy is an umbrella term.
It's a gay one
Which you would say I am sure "NO NEVER"
It wasn't though. Hitler and his ilk came to power thanks to a coup which was made possible because of a failed Marxist revolution.
The difference for Germany though was they didn't use a bunch of middlemen councils they enstated direct leaders
Sort of like a junta
To me, nothing is more depressing that the thought of revolutionaries conducting a slow revolution.
@Deleted User Hitler was given over power by Hindenberg
@fannybandit If it's slow it's not happening
Exactly.
In fact, that's how many far-right scumbags have come to power. Either off the backs of a failed commie revolution or because they were handed power after democratically elected officials were deposed by Western governments.
"Slow revolution"...what a joke.
All these gay leftists who've never read *The Coming Insurrection*
They never have the masses on their side and they never take power by force of will against astronomical odds.
I'd rather commies take to the streets and start bombing police stations and shit. Very good for what I want.
That is one thing that separates commies from the far-right.
@Deleted User >Hitler
>far-right
>off the back of a commie revolution (1918 one or Bavarian shitfest?)
Marxists have gotten revolution down to a science.
Okay then do it faggot
Make it happen
Everyone is waiting