Message from @Turdfag
Discord ID: 640937258064805888
Here I go again
in germany he's normal i suppose
kind of like the cyber hegelian ideal
or spirit
like, it's the land of poop shelves
ok
this has to stop
What did you mean when you said that Marxism is insufficient at producing a desirable end result for humanity
Fuck my mom found my piss drawer
@DEATH FUNK what's your actual problem
marxism doesnt accoutn for singularity
or does it?
I dont know
Something along the lines of human needs and desires being incapable of satisfying humanity
@ÜltraÜberGöttKönig you mean technological singularity?
Marxism has failed to intercept the technocapital
yes
@Эхо, Браво explain this notion pls
I want to cum on the marxist manifesto
@ÜltraÜberGöttKönig I think it does, he accounts for technological progress in historical materialism
Technology drives the changes of the mode of production and renders old modes of production obsolete
it roots all teh way back to kant who hypothesized that human must serve some kind of purpose, everything that consumes is somehow fuel for another creative force, except humans, turns out we are the fuel for the ai god slowly building itself through capitalism
Capital is intelligent "sentient" in a sense that it is just an artificial intelligence made to win games. When a bank takes your house, your property, it is not one person that does this.
I.e industrialized agriculture obsolescing feudalism
Interesting
Marx admired capital in the sense that it is not a static being.
But what he failed to realize is that capital does not woek for humanity
So how is the Marxist conception of the end of history developed phase of communism unable to fulfill human desire?
It's function is to win for the sake of winning, for itself.
Because I wonder about that myself sometimes
Will full communism really satisfy all of mankind indefinitely?
Capital does not take the progress of humanity, it does not wish for the winning of humanity.
I like to think that it would, but sometimes I feel like it wouldn't and that humanity would go mad
@Эхо, Браво I agree, but I'm unsure if Marx believed that it did
then why assume the progress
He believed that it would collapse under its own contradictions
That being capitalism
The contradictions do not meet an end point
His critique of capital is centered around the internal contradictions he identified
You really should read Anti-Oedipus and A Thousand Plateaus