The constitution is harder to change but it’s still organic

But no one cares

the constitution is an exception because those are the most important laws that America was founded on

Is this kid still saying the Constitution shouldn't change when one of the writers wanted it to

How is it organic?

What is this logic

Which writer wanted it to?

Jefferson

And Mr E have you ever heard of the case Marbury v Madison?

Like i already said

As if he knows anything

Yes and what proof is there that he wanted it changed?

And he doesn't overrule the other's wishes.

@Suleiman Nope.

Why?

That’s the case that granted the Supreme Court the power of Judicial Review and thus could declare acts ultra vires. So as early as like 1806 the constitution has been evolving with time

It is organic

What proof is there?

Shit

His words?

Got me

Fucking lol

"No proof he wanted that hahaha checkmate"

@buyXRBpls So you heard him say that then?

‘Nah I don’t want that proof I want other proof’

Yes actually

‘That proof isn’t proofy enough’

I was there

Taking someone's word isn't proof

What

@Suleiman Wait explain again please

The fucker

Explain what

wrote it

??

Madison vs macoroni or some shit

idfk

@buyXRBpls When? Where?

Show me where he wrote it. Because I'm skeptical of that.

Marbury v Madison is a piece of caselaw that set the precedence for judicial review which grants the Supreme Court the ability to declare acts by congress or orders by the executive ultra vires if they come into conflict with the constitution but at the same time they have the power to infer the constitution to adapt the meaning.

So it is organic.