@buyXRBpls Very panicked

Both

Inb4 haha that's right loser leave i am superior

😴

They take a law passed by the legislature or an executive order

and they say

'no'

or

Yes

😄 I am smart

someone has an issue that affects their constitutional rights

they go to the supreme court

they look at the constitution

then?

and if it doesnt comply they may say no or they may amend meanings and definitions behind the constitution

How do they amend meanings and definitions behind the constitution

like what do they amend too?

by taking the ambiguous words and changing the definition of these words

Yeah but what did they change exactly?

the definitions of the words

@buyXRBpls he is so dense

That's all?

yes and that makes the constitution organic

Just the words? Not the actual law itself?

No

they change the law

by changing the meaning

Okay but what law did they change?

What did they change that said law into?

Right, I am going to give you an example here ok?

and I am going to explain it

as best I can

so you understand

and after this

you accept i'm right

I'm sure you can make amends to the 2nd amendment and not allow some guns but I doubt you can down right ban guns if the 2nd amendment down right and explicitly explains that guns should be allowed

and Im sure you can even not allow some people to have guns either

But I doubt they can make a nationwide ban by changing the 2nd amendment that much

Obergefell v Hedges was a supreme court case a few years ago which allowed same-sex couples to marry. There was no constitutional protection for these marriages essentially saying that the 14th amendment requires all 50 states to follow this marriage equality law.

originally

this 14th amendment did not protect same sex couples