I am of the respectable anarchist nature

Anarchism is nothing.

and everything at the same time

No.

Yes.

It's reactionary.

It defines its liberation in terms of authority.

Fascinating assessment

Well I mean Mutualist anarchist theories go extensively into an economic and social model

A negation or opposite does not free itself, it determines itself by the master ideology as a reaction.

U vagina

I hate mutualists.

Have you ever read Proudhon?

Kropotkin?

You idiot.

Thoroughly.

Wat

Ah I see

'You idiot' so you're one of those who just make accusations and have no substance in your argument

fascinating

truly

Big boy in his centuries old theory boots.

Yes

If you are getting your information from wikipedia pages then thats your hang up

but to truly understand the ideology you need to read its base of existence, Locke, Hobbes, Rousseau, Kropotkin, Marx, Smith, Proudhon etc

If anarchism was relevant it would have constantly renewed theory.

It is hardly relevant

I've read all of those.

Anarchist isn't a threat to anyone

anarchism*

Those are rookie philosophers.

'Rookie' they're the fucking major ones

Rookie ones are the less known ones

How about Kant, Hegel, Zizek, Lacan, Deleuze and Foucault?

I read Hegel and Kant

not the latter few

That's your error. You study history. Not philosophy.

I study Politics and International Relations and Minor in History as well as Philosophy

That's nice. Been there done that.

sorry big lad

J.S Mill is bae