Lul

"rejects the 'immoral' ideology of socialism"

you really are the smartest here dude gg

more proofs

Oh because its immoral

pretty selfish too

this guy is a liberal and as bad as prager u

just go sleep kid

No competition

prager U aint liberal

i know smartass i said hes as bad as prager u

Im planning on it but I dont want to end on a depressing note

A

then just leave

he seems rather smart to me

got top comment

B-but 😦

Nah fuck it lol

cya commietard

lol what a shitter

Yes, because centralizing all agriculture and industry under a state politburo is such a great idea and totally won't end up like every other communist state from Catalonia to Maoist China

@Pissed Off Commie#4817

There is so much wrong with marxism

Socialism is said to be a way to get to communism and communism is said to be a way to go to anarchism and make it successful

no

anarchism is more like a tendency of communist

not only has every instance of anarchism been a total failure and that is incredibly idealized but communism itself also fails multiple times.

both communists and anarchists want to get to communism

just communists do it via socialism and anarchists do it via their own method

Unless you're ancap

and no other commies told me this

and it makes sense

its literally too idealized

communism as a movement ultimately didn't reach it's end goals, true, but it did a lot of good in the mean time

and in the mean time it's "idealism" is to bring democracy and industrialism to countries which had nothing

socialism is shit on its own then communism which is much worse then anarchism which is doomed to fail

uhhhh

do you know what communism is

like, communism can be refered to as both a material state and a movement

Oh yeah apparently that hasnt been achieved yet

yeah as a material state it hasn't been achieved