they will probably be declined. their income is too small, they cant donate anything, they run on a deficit, their population too small, their development too small, their currency they want to remain as the pound, the eu wont accept that and will want them to adopt euro.

their military will be too small too

all of the uks property will get pulled back...scotland doesnt have a military, it will have to form its own...the uk has a military, and that will be pulled back along with all of its property

and that what the EU will say when the proses starts in 10-15 years

its entire economic plans are based on "we have oil"....venezuela shows us what happens when you base your entire economic plans on the single oil market

The state of this... Labour in 5 or 6 years? LOLOLOLOLOLOL
https://youtu.be/Z8VLoyTOG3Y?t=602

Oil that they dont really own irr

oil that doesnt even make much..... it makes equivalent the the tax that a small english villiage makes

the entirety of scotland with everything they make, all of their income including oil..... it doesnt even make as much as the city of manchester makes in income tax....

It's inevitable that I'll end up doing videos about independence... I live in London but all my relatives are in Scotland...
...I used to believe in Scottish independence until real life made me understand why it would be a total disaster.

(I was SNP when still at school)

it is a nice thought to be independant, and if i was scottish myself id back it so long as it doesnt include joining the eu or doubling the population as sturgeon plans lol

and they probably need to build the infrastructure to get the benefits of said oil. and before that they need to rebuild a lot of the infrastructure that was depended of the rest of the UK

basically if i was a scot id back independance....but not woith sturgeon as the leader

Scottish independence was feasable until the 1970's... after that, the sums just don't add up.

i feel the question for independance is a bit unfair in that regard, because the only independant option they have is sturgeon....what if they want independance under another leader instead?

a leader of true nationalistic value

think half of the money Scotland spends comes from outside Scotland

sturgeon is a globalist who would make the scottish a minority in their own lands

she isnt the one to truly lead national independance

Sturgeon is pushing a Marxist, anti-monarchy, pro IRA position... anybody that is a traditional nationalist rejects that stance.

<:Commie_ball:466404411535785995>

yes, she totally embraces Globalism with a capital "G"

i checked out nucler power too and found out most of the nuke power plants in scotland are being dimantled for some reason

yep, it appears nuclear just isn't green enough

The cleanest form of power and it's "just not worth the risk"

it seems they invested so much into it though and they just scrapped it all

The power stations are reaching the end of their life cycles, but so far they haven't done anything about replacing them...
...it's a way of forcing Globalism on the population - the need to pipe power in from overseas.

they believe all nuclear power plans are Chernobyl's 2.0

but they dont understand why Chernobyl did happen, and the politics surrounding it did make it so much worse

now in glorious HD, hehehe
https://youtu.be/UzDX2M0HpCE

https://twitter.com/TPointUK/status/1206249957780574214

she is actually fuckin retarded

she is going to do the same shit as catalonia.....a illegal referendum that wasnt allowed and doesnt count, which will not be done properly, resulting in police having to arrest her and her party as rebels and criminals

and is catalonia independant? .....nope.... she should take a look at that and not go down that same route

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EL15xGTWoAAQQ6M?format=jpg&name=medium

ngl bro english police got nothing on scots @Caelus

^ the uk police in scotland are scottish