@yung More like until 1700-1900

Not really

give or take a few decades

@kArL#8084 Nah, 1700-1950’s

When the Europeans began to decolonize.

i guess thats when shit started going downhill

the European order is a disturbance in the general trend of history, as it should be abundantly clear that the Asian order will dominate once more

as it’s normal

yes once you started exploiting the whole world a little less, you got weaker

Glorious

that’s how being a leech on humanity works

No duh.

The Soviets and Communist Chinese alike have exploited, and in the Chinese case are still exploiting, the world quite a lot. You just can’t have an influential, modern nation-state, communist, capitalist or otherwise, without it.

China today isn’t even socialist

Back in the good ol’ days, I mean.

How was it imperialist?

Liberation is different than imperalism

How was the Soviet union imperialist

?

The tsar was chauvinist scum

@kArL#8084 I could say the same for the U.S. constantly invading the Middle East just because they're capitalist like me.

But I won't, because Imperialism is Imperialism, no matter how you slice it.

The US lives on imperialism, it cannot even function without it. The biggest leaps forward made by the SU was not due to imperialism but it’s efficiency

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YU_-0qKhNeg

To act like somehow eastern Europe was opposed to Socialism and it was imposed is complete nonsense

Uh,

Korea wasn’t imperialism at all

Prague Spring.

What about the Prague Spring

nigga wha

fukkin nazibot

anyway

It’s clear that if you’re going to be revisionist to everything Socialist and pander to market forces the SU is going to take it lightly

especially once it is cornered by Capitalist states only

like come on

SU was partially imperialist

Nice try tankie

how can you even start to compare

Kiiiinda in response to the fact the the Czechs didn't really like Communism.

😎

Or that Dubcek didn’t like communism maybe