@kArL#8084 More like education beyond 5th grade should be specialized to fit one’s individual needs instead of being a “one size fits all” kind of thing.

I actually agree

@Ｋ▲ＩＳＥＲ Quick Global History Lesson:
500-1100: Islamic and African trade pioneers trade
1200-1300: Rise and fall of Mongols
1400-1800: Surge of Land Empires such as Islamic, Chinese and Russian, with simultaneous building up of European sea empires, that maintained amicable and subordinated relations with land empires as they were weaker and it was visible from the little war that happened.
Mercantile Capitalism started as a base for European development, but only with industrial Capitalism did the West diverge greatly in influence

No education at all.

Revisionists.

1800-2015 the rise of the jewish international clique

<:bour:313709044957315082>

Only communist education

@Ｋ▲ＩＳＥＲ Before 1700-1800 the world was completely multipolar, and Europe was the weakest out of Eastern Asian empires and Middle Eastern empires, by late 1800 (high imperialist phase) the West had made that great leap you liberal idiots like to masturbate about

Alright, you pushing the date back to 1700 makes me agree with you a hell of a lot more than before.

Hardly dominating

But dominating nonetheless.

@yung More like until 1700-1900

Not really

give or take a few decades

@kArL#8084 Nah, 1700-1950’s

When the Europeans began to decolonize.

i guess thats when shit started going downhill

the European order is a disturbance in the general trend of history, as it should be abundantly clear that the Asian order will dominate once more

as it’s normal

yes once you started exploiting the whole world a little less, you got weaker

Glorious

that’s how being a leech on humanity works

No duh.

The Soviets and Communist Chinese alike have exploited, and in the Chinese case are still exploiting, the world quite a lot. You just can’t have an influential, modern nation-state, communist, capitalist or otherwise, without it.

China today isn’t even socialist

Back in the good ol’ days, I mean.

How was it imperialist?

Liberation is different than imperalism

How was the Soviet union imperialist

?

The tsar was chauvinist scum

@kArL#8084 I could say the same for the U.S. constantly invading the Middle East just because they're capitalist like me.

But I won't, because Imperialism is Imperialism, no matter how you slice it.

The US lives on imperialism, it cannot even function without it. The biggest leaps forward made by the SU was not due to imperialism but it’s efficiency

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YU_-0qKhNeg

To act like somehow eastern Europe was opposed to Socialism and it was imposed is complete nonsense

Uh,

Korea wasn’t imperialism at all

Prague Spring.