Message from @K▲ISER

Discord ID: 433785822546886676


2018-04-12 00:24:20 UTC  

The Russians have literal thousands of nukes, that’s more than enough to bomb every US state at least 20 times.

2018-04-12 00:24:33 UTC  

Hell, they have more than us.

2018-04-12 00:24:35 UTC  

They have to focus on other nations as well.

2018-04-12 00:24:41 UTC  

trump is fucking retarded lmao

2018-04-12 00:24:47 UTC  

You can't just shoot your load all at once.

2018-04-12 00:24:56 UTC  

Barely, but once you go past 2,000 it really doesn’t matter.

2018-04-12 00:25:22 UTC  

I don't see anyone nuking places where there are mostly civilians.

2018-04-12 00:25:32 UTC  

D.C. being the exception since it's the capitol.

2018-04-12 00:26:19 UTC  

Maybe the U.S. and Russia will be sensible and not launch any nukes at all, who knows.

2018-04-12 00:26:37 UTC  

Trump may not be the smartest, but he’s not a warmonger.

2018-04-12 00:26:41 UTC  

In war, everything at their disposal will be used.

2018-04-12 00:26:43 UTC  

Same with Putin.

2018-04-12 00:27:14 UTC  

Remember what happened the last time there was war and nukes at the same time?

2018-04-12 00:27:39 UTC  

WWII?

2018-04-12 00:28:07 UTC  

What happened to Japan?

2018-04-12 00:28:58 UTC  

Anime was created from the radiation

2018-04-12 00:29:04 UTC  

lol

2018-04-12 00:29:09 UTC  

Nuked because Nuclear weapons weren’t something many people had and therefore there was no threat of total nuclear annihilation.

2018-04-12 00:29:22 UTC  

@buyXRBpls yes, yes it was

2018-04-12 00:29:45 UTC  

There's still a chance there won't be nuclear annihilation. There are militaristic counter-measures.

2018-04-12 00:29:59 UTC  

And tactical nukes, yes.

2018-04-12 00:30:05 UTC  

Using nukes doesn't automatically mean global annihilation.

2018-04-12 00:30:25 UTC  

They're a strategic weapon, just like anything else.

2018-04-12 00:30:53 UTC  

@fannybandit Why woulden't russia fire everything?

2018-04-12 00:31:13 UTC  

Simple, because they may not hit their targets the first try.

2018-04-12 00:31:22 UTC  

Ever superpower has counter-measures.

2018-04-12 00:31:48 UTC  

If they're smart, they will target the capitol along with strategic assets.

2018-04-12 00:31:51 UTC  

Then woulden't it make more sense just to fire a few nukes in a general area?

2018-04-12 00:32:26 UTC  

That wouldn't work if the counter-measures are designed to repel that type of attack.

2018-04-12 00:32:46 UTC  

Once large explosion in the sky can drop those nukes if the come at the same time.

2018-04-12 00:33:02 UTC  

There aren't any practical means of defending from a a nuclear attack though.

2018-04-12 00:33:28 UTC  

Russia has a very practical method...have you seen their counter-missile systems?

2018-04-12 00:33:40 UTC  

They can shoot down multiple nukes in minutes.

2018-04-12 00:33:48 UTC  

Practical? I doubt it.

2018-04-12 00:34:14 UTC  

They coulden't even stop most of the old and shitty tomahawk missiles that the US fired at syria.

2018-04-12 00:34:17 UTC  

Interceptor missiles are very practical.

2018-04-12 00:34:48 UTC  

Those 50 shitty tomahawk missiles are very fast.

2018-04-12 00:35:02 UTC  

ICBMs...not as quick.

2018-04-12 00:35:12 UTC  

Bigger payload.

2018-04-12 00:36:03 UTC  

dude interception missiles arent as good and precise as you think

2018-04-12 00:36:25 UTC  

if that technology was actually well developed and had a big percentage of success