Message from @timdhawk
Discord ID: 663773533859610624
4th went through, but it basically landed on top of one of the previous rounds
Well... Ideally it only needs to work once and long enough to get off the X
I'm off the sleep... Have a good one.
This was a pretty funny read
Yeah they can go fuck themselves, because they are controlled by Iran. Or we could pull out every asset, every item we even gave them, every single thing we done there. And watch Iran destroy them within 3 years.
Right
Let’s get it over with. They keep asking for it
I’m tired of this fucking touch and go shit
I just wish someone would make a decision and full send
Are we going over there to stack bodies or are we not.
And if we are, don’t announce it on the media and fuck with OPSEC.
🤣🤣🤣
Because right now we got a ranger regiment and jumpy bois there. Let’s do some airfield seizures and send us 101st helicopter airsalt bois in and do some fucking shit up. Have the navy using them damn tomahawks, and have the airforce get them drones and good ol a10’s fucking shit up
And the coast guard to help with small boat for the navy.
Get the marines to do some beach assaults
And show these pussies how to stack bodies
read the first comment. Kinda what we all thought! https://www.reddit.com/r/news/comments/ekt19e/huge_crowds_in_iran_for_commanders_funeral/?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share
Funny thing I was reading
So the strike against Soleimani was essentially a throw away COA that staffers briefed to Trump
They briefed several different COAs as a response to the embassy being targetted
Like striking militia groups, striking arms factories in Iran, etc.
They decided fuck it and went with that
They included striking Soleimani as a worst case to make the other options seem less extreme
And trump was like "that one"
Lol
Yeah let’s just strike their arms factories
Staffers were like "uuuuh you weren't supposed to pick that one"
Haha
That was funny
Anyway, here we are
Lesson learned for staffers, don't play politics with military strategy
Exactly. “This one, this worse one, and this one that makes sense and would send a powerful message”
Holy shit am I conflicted about this... On the one hand I am very pro2a and constitutional rights, but on the other hand I do have a problem with and think people like this individual who should not be allowed to have firearms. There certainly is no easy one-step solution to this... this shit causes me internal conflict! https://www.reddit.com/r/news/comments/ekp8f0/colorados_redflag_law_invoked_likely_for_the/?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share
I don't see it as a 2A issue
It's a due process issue as well as a accountability one
I don't disagree on that front either. I am most certainly not a fan of a police officer or Police department arbitrarily deciding that someone is a danger to themselves or someone else... and without an actual third-party type due process option in place it still leaves me torn. We have countless dead women and children from abusive ass wipes like this who shouldn't have been able to have a gun, but I also don't think someone should be able to claimed that someone else has a threat and that's all that's needed for someone to come in and take guns. I honestly don't know what the right answer is....
I mean what's to stop your far left leaning nut job neighbor from seeing you unload your rig after a long day at the range and claim they fear for their lives...?
That’s why I live in the middle of no where lol
It does have its advantages doesn't it!