Message from @Suleiman
Discord ID: 435450270110187520
oh ok read it as soon as I asked you
Yeah, Socialist nations of the third world tend to be authoritarian when enacting reforms that are supposed to get them at the basic economic level of Capitalist industrialization.
No one seems to complain about it though
what in the
@yung No, they did.
everyone in Africa loves Thomas Ankara
FUCK
Sankara
lmao
ew
Are you having a stroke
turks
cockroaches
Really ironic that a nazi would talk all that free press shit too
Lul
@yung Hence why there was teacher strike that ended with the educational system being destroyed, and sankara watched it burn as well.
Lol nice cherry picking without any context btw
Saying you’ll kill all the Jews is different than overthrowing a democracy and actually killing all the Jews.
Actions, not words.
Who is saying they should kill the jews? lmao?
@yung "Sankara also launched education programs to help combat the country's 90% illiteracy rate. These programs had some success in the first few years. However, wide-scale teacher strikes, coupled with Sankara's unwillingness to negotiate, led to the creation of "Revolutionary Teachers". In an attempt to replace the nearly 2,500 teachers fired over a strike in 1987, anyone with a college degree was invited to teach through the revolutionary teachers program. Volunteers received a 10-day training course before being sent off to teach; the results were disastrous.[5]"
Stop arguing with my boyfriend
I was highlighting why Nazi shit is still free speech, sorreh.
I ain't against free speech.
@Deleted User aaaaaand the source doesn’t mention this
at all
“the effects were disastrous”
“I ain’t against free speech”
“The Nazis won fairly”
pick one
@yung Tell me how it dosen't pal. http://newsreel.org/nav/title.asp?tc=CN0205
there is nothing wrong with punching capitalists
change my mind
@Deleted User Edgy.
i thought nazis hated capitalists too?
By that logic there’s nothing wrong with punching people I don’t agree with.
@yung "While celebrating Sankara’s achievements, this film does not ignore his tragic flaws. By 1986 Sankara’s rapid, sometimes authoritarian changes had begun to alienate larger sectors of the Burkinabe population, leaving him more isolated, even from elements in his own ruling circle. Like revolutionaries as far back as the French Revolution, Sankara was so committed to achieving his ideals, he was unwilling to give them enough time to ripen in his people. As one close friend observes, ‘Sankara was an impatient man,’ driven by the desperation of his people. As opposition mounted, Sankara attempted to repress it. He established Peoples Revolutionary Tribunals in towns and workplaces around the country where people were tried without counsel for being corrupt officials, counter-revolutionaries or just lazy workers, based not on credible evidence just private grudges. He also encouraged the formation of Revolutionary Defense Committees, gangs of armed youth who terrorized ordinary citizens. When the nation’s school teachers went on strike, Sankara dismissed all of them, leaving the education system, his country’s greatest hope for progress, a shambles. "
it says “it left the education system damaged” Doesn’t elaborate at all
instead of punching you fellas prefer gassings so eh