mark was the first theorist i not only agreed the fuck with, but somebody who could put into words the things i thought better than i could

i know this is painfully cliche, but i really want to see what nietzsche would've done had he not collapsed into madness

he seems to be in a similar ballpark

at least in the "being stunted before hitting full potential"

oh yeah, and i'm partial to post-punk, so now i'm even more bummed.

https://egressac.wordpress.com

started flipping through, holy shit is he a good writer

I'm not very sympathetic to psychiatry and psychology

So reading Mark was sort of

the basis of a really good critique of psychologisation for me

the only psych-related person i've really read so far is freud.

kill me.

That's fine

also, just realized freud would be a fantastic halloween costume

He's utilised by Lacan

and Zizek is a good Lacanian to study

Freud is all over lots of really good anti-capitalist psychoanalysis

i still certainly need to get into other people, though

maybe jung next?

baby steps.

You can skip Jung

who should i go to after freud?

Lacan

definitely

Reading Fink's Lacanian Subject will help

going straight to Ecrits will make you never want to read psychoanalysis again

And then instead of bothering too much with Ecrits you could check out Zizek, despite his recent foray into reactionary territory

kk

well lads, i'm gonna get to bed

it's about 3 am over here

goodnight fam

ﾠ

https://www.reddit.com/r/relationships/comments/8heojs/my_34m_friend_33m_acted_strangely_last_night_at_a/

who was in the wrong?

Pula

The slovene capital of Istria

@Lord Irontower#6636 idk whats wrong with imperialism

Hey kids

Dont forget