https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bMXNL0WAr8g

At this point "liberal" is just a smear word you use. Liberals cannot by definition be actual advocates for socialism and actual advocates for socialism cannot by definition be liberals. There is no intellectual proof that backs the opposite of that. It's based on the straight up thesis of either of those groups. They are mutually exsclusive. If you don't get that then you are basically denying a simple fact of leftwing and progressive politics @Mr. X.

Wow it took you that long just to type that?

Okay lets give it a read.

My keys where sticky

Sorry

Mr E reading

Nope

@maostravelagent I dont want to know why.

@maostravelagent Most liberals arent, some are.

What

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberal_socialism

Literally what

That doesn't make me a liberal since somehow like 5 liberals want actual socialism.

Oh I get it

More than 5 liberals

I called myself a "libsoc"

I don't think you know what these words mean

Do you?

I'm a libertarian socialist

Literally says it does not want to abolish capitalism

Not a liberal socialist

Ah ok.

>supports a mixed economy

He thinks they are the same

Also probably thinks that is a contradiction

At leas I got that cleared up

"Liberal socialism does not have the goal of completely abolishing capitalism and replacing it with socialism,[2] but it instead supports a mixed economy that includes both private property and social ownership in capital goods"

"but it instead supports a mixed economy that includes both private property and social ownership in capital goods""

Yes

But yeah you're still a dip

Gn

There are liberals who want full socialism though.

@maostravelagent and you're still a dumb socialist so gg.

Literally what

It's like 2:00 am here

"Anyone that is not me is a liberal"

No, just liberals.

@maostravelagent cool idc.

I wish everyone in the right were all dumb as Mr E

Same