they may be biased but the evidence is there

And not really reliable.

"unbiased" accounts are just biased against stalin

Well if you see a source that may not be biased then link me and Ill check it out.

I mean yeah, you can basically say the same with accounts against hitler too.

I want some Eurasian Federatio, baby.

What flag is that?

The Flag of the Eurasian Party in Russia.

Idk much about them, but the flag looks nice.

Just found it, so...

Mkay.

It does look like a pretty good flag tbh.

A bit edgy due to being black though.

they're nazbol

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yQkTcmfy2QM&t=361s

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eurasia_Party

Figures.

I've already watched that video before and he didnt do any convincing.

yeah

I think I've talked about it before when it was posted here.

Ye, just read their policy. Some kind of Nazbol group, I think,

but you are biased

Like ages ago

Everyone is biased

you come into the video already denouncing it

i used to biased against stalin

thats why i was a trot

Yes, because I believe in better sources. More reliable sources. That's biased of course yet it works.

If there's a source that proves otherwise from someone who isnt a communist or stalinist then yeah I might believe them more if its more than just statistics and have better evidence.

Depends on how much evidence the communist has too. It also depends on if its propaganda or not.

alot of american "evidence" is just blatant lies

^

google the black book of communism

And you know that how?

Blatant Lies? Are you trying to tell me, that capitalism isn´t honest to us?

Im not talking about the black book of communism.

I havent read it.

thats were the gorillions statistics come from

Im not talking about statistics either.

when people say stalin killed 40 million or 70 million or 100 million