right?

Correct.

well that's a load of shit argument

of course

How?

it's obviously true we may be living in a simulation

What is your counter argument?

i have none, but you can't assert that we are in fact living in a simulation

you can only say it's possible

such as there may be life on other planets

I never said we are living in a simulation

yes its possible

and if our simulations shows signs of creating other simulations the evidence suggests that there's a higher chance that we're a simulation

this is my third time explaining it to you.

well no because theoretically it would be possible that we're living in a simulation even without being able to create our own simulations

AI greatly proves this theory too.

this is why you were confusing me

Yes but it would be more evident if it was possible for us to make simulations

because from a theoretically logical standpoint it seems obvious that we may be living in a simulation

especially simulations very much like our own

i suppose so

Fucksake, you're such an idiot.

i just thought it was obvious from the start

"I thought it was obvious even though I was questioning it the whole time"

i don't believe we need to create simulations to know that we may be living in one

Totally.

No but it would show more evidence that we're in one.

Ffs you're still not getting it.

well it would show more evidence, but if there's no way to prove we are or are not in one anyway, what's the point?

There is none.

well there you have it that's why i was confused

because there is no point to this

i thought there might've been some actual real way to prove for sure we're in a simulation

but no

Then you're retarded.

Because I think therefore I am isnt a good argument

if anything I wouldn't be surprised we were programmed AI

this is all possible

Exactly

but just because we can create our AI and simulations doesnt actually mean more evidence