Message from @Amoviet
Discord ID: 468984720533880832
Were slaves put in cages?
Yes
So being caged has no bearing on slavehood
if you're under the control of someone and your only option is to work for them or die, that is slavery
its as simple as that
It doesnt no, nor did I say it does
@BabygottBach You are applying the same moral complexity of locking up a person for manual labor and treating them like an animal to locking up an animal and treating it like an animal. (By animal I mean something non-sentient/sapient, like a Buffalo.)
No i"m not
You are,
Sure seems like it, considering the comparison you made.
we're haing two separate discussions here
Animals are sentient
Your Counterargument is faulty.
I'm way past animals now
This is fucking gay lmao
My counterargument worked. It forced E to shift goal posts
now his definition of slavery has changed
No I didnt
my definition is the exact same
it now includes "being under the control of someone"
Yes which was my definition at first
Rather than address the point made?
You never said that before my cage slave example. You merely said "needing to work to live"
and you need to work under someone when you work usually.
are you talking to me or E?
I thought this was common sense
You.
I was never talking to you, but to E
I thought you were talking to E
gg
Press F for respects
Even though you responded to me about my point?
Bear Gryllis in the alps needs to work to live, so he would be a slave under your definition
No, he's rich isnt he?
He has a choice
Not when he's on the Alps
The man’s loaded. He’s just doing what he likes.
In that moment, when he's alone on the alps, he's a slave
according to E
Who is he serving then?