Message from @Mr. X
Discord ID: 468985108624441346
Animals are sentient
Your Counterargument is faulty.
I'm way past animals now
This is fucking gay lmao
My counterargument worked. It forced E to shift goal posts
now his definition of slavery has changed
No I didnt
my definition is the exact same
it now includes "being under the control of someone"
So as soon as you realize you might be wrong, you claim you were never talking about this?
Yes which was my definition at first
Rather than address the point made?
You never said that before my cage slave example. You merely said "needing to work to live"
and you need to work under someone when you work usually.
are you talking to me or E?
I thought this was common sense
You.
I was never talking to you, but to E
I thought you were talking to E
gg
Even though you responded to me about my point?
Bear Gryllis in the alps needs to work to live, so he would be a slave under your definition
No, he's rich isnt he?
He has a choice
Not when he's on the Alps
The man’s loaded. He’s just doing what he likes.
In that moment, when he's alone on the alps, he's a slave
according to E
Who is he serving then?
even though he works under no one
No, when he's alone and rich he's not a slave at all
Amos, when did I respond to your point?
but he has to work to stay alive in the Alps
When you're alone you're one of the most free people
You're against missing my point
But you really have to work your ass off then
he works for himself
he doesn't work he dieas
dies
You said “no I didn’t,” as in “you made this comparison,” “no I didn’t,” and you backed into a corner when you realized you were wrong.