violence used to achieve political goals is fascism now

Most are like that tho

@Mr. X Yes and I know thay

which means that the people who fought against the nazis in WW2 must have been fascists

because they used violence

No, violence used to achieve political goals is terrorism

then how do you define fascism?

@DA GOMMIE JOO I was busy trying to read a veggie boy and a scizoid basically crying.

I need more context than a single sentence

@DA GOMMIE JOO They were using defensive violence

It's a total false comparison

USA: used helmets
Nazi Germany: used helmets
USA: used tanks
Nazi Germany: used tanks
USA: used guns
Nazi Germany: used guns
USA: had flags
Nazi Germany: had flags
literally the same

This is what you always do slug

"defensive violence"
the USA was in no danger from nazi germany

they could've easily allied with them

you intentionally miss people's points to try and make their point nothing

Yes, we wrre

but they chose not to

and fail because you're a vegetable

The US knew that after taking over the rest of the world NG would come for them too

NG?

And defensive violence can be in defense of oneself *or* of others

Nazi Germany

so here's a question

was the vietnam war justified?

Hitler wanted peace with the US and to be allies with the UK at first

the vietnam war was incredible but an unfortunate loss

because if it wasn't then the USA must be terrorists

I have to congratulate the vietnamese for their tactics though

because they didn't use so-called "defensive violence"

The USA has done many acts of terrorism around the world

so the USA are terrorists

No

if they commit acts of terrorism then they are terrorists

members of the government have paid terrorists though

that's kind of the definition of terrorist

No, the leaders at the times that those things happened are

if all the government or most of the government does terrorist acts then they are terrorists

.

so the CIA are terrorists then?

Some of them yes