End

Sorry I’m slow

World revolution as opposed to socialism in one state.

Even after he stopped to advocate it openly he still did it in more ideologically hidden ways

@Deleted User nope

Socialism in one country advocates for world revolution

Permanent revolution is just unrealistic

how so?

It said a country recently involved in a huge civil war and economically exhausted should throw itself in war with the entirety of Europe

That's not advocating for world socialism

Just a idealistic fantasy

Why did he want that

What’s the point

delusional kike

Because he didn't believe in the proletarian peasant alliance

@Deleted Usermarx was a jew lmao

@Frosty and so there are the differences

Mostly

There are other things

and so were many other communists, i know.

grug no like dominance hierarchies, they are unnatu- *gets head bashed in with club*

Organizational hierarchy of manager and logistics and workers is ok

What is not ok is class society

Putting it simply

Marxists aren't romantic anti capitalists

So...are their any rules in this server or......?

I...don't really see any guidelines.

I think it's on the fixed messages

@Angery NPC

Aristocracy is a positive influence I'd say until they are replaced with merchants and become bourgeois/decadent. Without a nation's leader class it becomes easy for it to be controlled by (((internationalist interests))) who become the ruling class by default after the overthrow of the nation's leadership.

It's not bad if it's national!

not an argument.

monarcom

Internationalism is essential

Nations eventually will fade

And the proletariat is a world class

And should have world iron unity

The proletariat of the foreign country is more important than the bourgeois class of mine

👌

Aristocracy and bourgeois are the same thing in capitalism

They are, because by that stage the Aristocracy ceased to be nobility and became the merchant class.