Message from @my

Discord ID: 474748664645025793


2018-08-03 01:10:45 UTC  

Putting it simply

2018-08-03 01:13:12 UTC  

Marxists aren't romantic anti capitalists

2018-08-03 01:14:15 UTC  

So...are their any rules in this server or......?

2018-08-03 01:14:39 UTC  

I...don't really see any guidelines.

2018-08-03 01:15:40 UTC  

I think it's on the fixed messages

2018-08-03 01:16:01 UTC  
2018-08-03 01:16:52 UTC  

Aristocracy is a positive influence I'd say until they are replaced with merchants and become bourgeois/decadent. Without a nation's leader class it becomes easy for it to be controlled by (((internationalist interests))) who become the ruling class by default after the overthrow of the nation's leadership.

2018-08-03 01:17:50 UTC  

It's not bad if it's national!

2018-08-03 01:18:04 UTC  

not an argument.

2018-08-03 01:18:07 UTC  

monarcom

2018-08-03 01:18:14 UTC  

Internationalism is essential

2018-08-03 01:18:23 UTC  

Nations eventually will fade

2018-08-03 01:18:33 UTC  

And the proletariat is a world class

2018-08-03 01:18:52 UTC  

And should have world iron unity

2018-08-03 01:19:26 UTC  

The proletariat of the foreign country is more important than the bourgeois class of mine

2018-08-03 01:20:23 UTC  

👌

2018-08-03 01:20:45 UTC  

Aristocracy and bourgeois are the same thing in capitalism

2018-08-03 01:21:19 UTC  

They are, because by that stage the Aristocracy ceased to be nobility and became the merchant class.

2018-08-03 01:21:23 UTC  

🤔

2018-08-03 01:21:28 UTC  

@Deleted User plus sorry for that statement above I didn't know terrific meant formidable

2018-08-03 01:21:42 UTC  

if i get wealth by threatening to kill u that is good

2018-08-03 01:21:43 UTC  

bit

2018-08-03 01:21:44 UTC  

but

2018-08-03 01:21:54 UTC  

if i get wealth by exploiting the working class

2018-08-03 01:21:57 UTC  

hmm!

2018-08-03 01:21:57 UTC  

Implying the nobility can't partake into the bourgeoisie

2018-08-03 01:21:59 UTC  

bad!

2018-08-03 01:22:17 UTC  

The German junkers are the best example

2018-08-03 01:22:19 UTC  

implying that nobility and bourgeoisie are the same thing

2018-08-03 01:22:30 UTC  

They formed the national bourgeoisie

2018-08-03 01:22:41 UTC  

Mainly the Prussian ones of course

2018-08-03 01:22:50 UTC  

I never did that

2018-08-03 01:23:26 UTC  

But you say they can't exist as one

2018-08-03 01:24:07 UTC  

And the progression of society ruled by commodities slowly strips away the noble formalities

2018-08-03 01:24:14 UTC  

Only if they have been corrupted and detached from the life of the national community.

2018-08-03 01:24:25 UTC  

"Corrupted"

2018-08-03 01:24:28 UTC  

Why so?

2018-08-03 01:25:18 UTC  

Because nobility eventually changed its definition to having material wealth, instead of character, virtue, good breeding.

2018-08-03 01:25:30 UTC  

And what they had before?

2018-08-03 01:25:41 UTC  

They were feudal lords

2018-08-03 01:26:05 UTC  

They focused on brute power and wealthyness as well