Message from @my
Discord ID: 474748664645025793
Putting it simply
Marxists aren't romantic anti capitalists
So...are their any rules in this server or......?
I...don't really see any guidelines.
I think it's on the fixed messages
Aristocracy is a positive influence I'd say until they are replaced with merchants and become bourgeois/decadent. Without a nation's leader class it becomes easy for it to be controlled by (((internationalist interests))) who become the ruling class by default after the overthrow of the nation's leadership.
It's not bad if it's national!
not an argument.
monarcom
Internationalism is essential
Nations eventually will fade
And the proletariat is a world class
And should have world iron unity
The proletariat of the foreign country is more important than the bourgeois class of mine
👌
Aristocracy and bourgeois are the same thing in capitalism
They are, because by that stage the Aristocracy ceased to be nobility and became the merchant class.
🤔
@Deleted User plus sorry for that statement above I didn't know terrific meant formidable
bit
but
if i get wealth by exploiting the working class
hmm!
Implying the nobility can't partake into the bourgeoisie
bad!
The German junkers are the best example
implying that nobility and bourgeoisie are the same thing
They formed the national bourgeoisie
Mainly the Prussian ones of course
I never did that
But you say they can't exist as one
And the progression of society ruled by commodities slowly strips away the noble formalities
Only if they have been corrupted and detached from the life of the national community.
"Corrupted"
Why so?
Because nobility eventually changed its definition to having material wealth, instead of character, virtue, good breeding.
And what they had before?
They were feudal lords
They focused on brute power and wealthyness as well