https://i.warosu.org/data/sci/img/0079/55/1458886562400.jpg here's a better sketch

to show the difference

@Deleted User would you be willing to agree 4/5 are very similar

whilst one completely stands out

i'd agree that 2/5 are actually similar

the congoloid and australoid

congoloids and caucasoids skulls are similar

they even look similar

the australoid completely stands out

they are the true other Race not sub species quite but race

notice the back of the skull from congoloid and caucausoids

notice the cheekbones

Well they are our species but are the furthurest from the blacks,whites and asians

??

were debating what race is

I thought phrenology wasn't practiced anymore.

its a category in between sub species and ethnic cluster

yeah, if you try and practice phrenology in 2018, you'd get called a racist and a nazi

also american blacks skulls and facial features seem much more similar to the caucasoid

that's because it's been de-bunked

thats cause the native americans are more developed

comparing to negroids

The differences between the races are quite minimal

you stated that black people couldn't make anything but mud

i said american blacks african americans

yet

you look at people like MLK, or frederick douglas

i mean they can ethopia is doing it and so is rwanda.

Which have achieved far more than many white people.

rwanda is doing it well with even a low gdp

*who have

MLK lived in a society with white people, and if he didnt do it, he'd be in africa killing other tribes

which is a huge achievement for them

Also the malian empire certaintly built more than mud

How so?

that seems cultural

and there was no white interference with them

are you submitting that culture actually makes a difference

I wonder if blacks colonized europe, @Deleted User would be saying the exact opposite

they wouldnt be saying mud huts

they would be saying tan huts