I've taken my screenshot out of your photo itself, why does your initial one differentiate from this one?

the frontal lobe on the right is smaller comparing to the left

@Deleted User

that seems more like ethnic difference the aboriginal one is the only real MAJOR different one

at least by ethnic standards

@Ardennes simple difference is that you refuse to show the side view of the skulls, and you show frontal views, of course the fucking skulls would look the same from front view, so why not post the side view to see how equal we are?

because I've used what you've given me

like I said

no you havent

you havent shown the side view of the skulls

he wants images of real skulls

on the side

this is from you

not drawings

https://i.warosu.org/data/sci/img/0079/55/1458886562400.jpg here's a better sketch

to show the difference

@Deleted User would you be willing to agree 4/5 are very similar

whilst one completely stands out

i'd agree that 2/5 are actually similar

the congoloid and australoid

congoloids and caucasoids skulls are similar

they even look similar

the australoid completely stands out

they are the true other Race not sub species quite but race

notice the back of the skull from congoloid and caucausoids

notice the cheekbones

Well they are our species but are the furthurest from the blacks,whites and asians

??

were debating what race is

I thought phrenology wasn't practiced anymore.

its a category in between sub species and ethnic cluster

yeah, if you try and practice phrenology in 2018, you'd get called a racist and a nazi

also american blacks skulls and facial features seem much more similar to the caucasoid

that's because it's been de-bunked

thats cause the native americans are more developed

comparing to negroids

The differences between the races are quite minimal

you stated that black people couldn't make anything but mud

i said american blacks african americans

yet

you look at people like MLK, or frederick douglas