>hey I know more than the CIA xd

Look at your own source. It says the soviet civilians were polled by the soviets.

>hey the cia was wrong i’m right (no source)

@DA GOMMIE JOO they do that with other documents too

like i said if it was false why would they publish it

mr. e knows more than the central *intelligence* agency
but it's a seeeecret

your source is my source

@Mr. X such as...

inb4 "no I'm not looking it up for you"

I told you for the 5th time, they published it because they probably wanted to be neutral

lol

>the CIA
>neutral

@DA GOMMIE JOO Depends in what

when it came to this study yes

You're looking at the wrong place

the cia wants to be neutral with their worst enemy

yeet

Yes

What retard would want to make the cold war anymore intense?

Other than the cubans?

you’re right let’s pretend the CIA didn’t try to kill castro a thousand times

that isn’t making the cold war worse

why are you such a brainlet

That's a whole other incident

"hey our worst enemy who we're committed to destroying just sent us some wrong statistics"
"go ahead and publish them while acting like they're true just to stay neutral"
"but we hate them"
"yeah but we don't hate them enough to lie about them"
"uh yes we do, we did that before"
"SHUT UP AND PUBLISH THE DAMN PAPER"

No they hate them for sure

and they didnt lie about them

https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/docs/DOC_0000498133.pdf

Im not the CIA I dont know why they were dumb enough to publish wrong statistics

Or source I mean

>yeah man the USDA reviewed soviet data and they found it was incorrect so they published it anyway

t. you

How did they review the data exactly?

You're just assuming this.

statistical data

show me

USDA: these data are wrong
CIA: publish them anyway
USDA: why
CIA: because we love the soviets and they're our favorite ally
USDA: who the fuck spiked my drink

No, because I dont have any

exactly

and I do

They obviously didnt think the data was wrong