Message from @DA GOMMIE JOO

Discord ID: 492435726705754115


2018-09-20 20:40:17 UTC  

lol

2018-09-20 20:40:35 UTC  

>is simbly untroo XD

2018-09-20 20:41:00 UTC  

It is

2018-09-20 20:41:28 UTC  

For example, 2 + 2 doesnt = 3

2018-09-20 20:42:08 UTC  

so everything you disagree with is just obviously untrue, no further explanation needed

2018-09-20 20:42:15 UTC  

No

2018-09-20 20:42:24 UTC  

and my point is made

2018-09-20 20:42:27 UTC  

Everything that is wrong is unture

2018-09-20 20:42:29 UTC  

untrue*

2018-09-20 20:42:38 UTC  

Your point is wrong

2018-09-20 20:42:52 UTC  

that’s a double negative

2018-09-20 20:42:57 UTC  

"everything that is wrong is untrue"

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/308950154222895104/492435520773685248/logic.gif

2018-09-20 20:43:04 UTC  

so everything that is wrong is true?

2018-09-20 20:43:05 UTC  

No its not?

2018-09-20 20:43:11 UTC  

And thats not circular logic

2018-09-20 20:43:21 UTC  

No everything wrong is untrue

2018-09-20 20:43:22 UTC  

then how do you tell if something's wrong?

2018-09-20 20:43:29 UTC  

As in everything that is untrue is untrue

2018-09-20 20:43:35 UTC  

For example

2018-09-20 20:43:40 UTC  

2+2 doesnt = 3

2018-09-20 20:43:48 UTC  

I use my brain thats how

2018-09-20 20:43:51 UTC  

this isn’t math you fucking idiot

2018-09-20 20:43:55 UTC  

in fact

2018-09-20 20:43:58 UTC  

Never said it was

2018-09-20 20:43:58 UTC  

Einstein proved it could: math is a tool

2018-09-20 20:44:02 UTC  

I used it as an example

2018-09-20 20:44:05 UTC  

i provided evidence against you

2018-09-20 20:44:10 UTC  

and as usual you have an autism attack

2018-09-20 20:44:12 UTC  

No you didnt

2018-09-20 20:44:16 UTC  

and no I didnt

2018-09-20 20:44:45 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/308950154222895104/492435972986765323/image0.jpg

2018-09-20 20:44:52 UTC  

oh that evidence

2018-09-20 20:44:56 UTC  

that's just a graph

2018-09-20 20:45:20 UTC  

fucking nuclear take

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/308950154222895104/492436120483790848/unknown.png

2018-09-20 20:45:20 UTC  

is there atleast a source?

2018-09-20 20:45:42 UTC  

I mean usually when someone provides evidence it needs to be good evidence

2018-09-20 20:45:48 UTC  
2018-09-20 20:45:52 UTC  

Not a good source

2018-09-20 20:45:54 UTC  

“There is general agreement that profit rates fell from the late 1960s until the early 1980s. There is also agreement that profit rates partially recovered after the early 1980s, but with interruptions at the end of the 1980s and the end of the 1990s. There is also an important area of agreement that the fall from the mid-1970s to the early 1980s was not a result of rising wages, since this was the period in which US real wages began a decline which was not partially reversed until the late 1990s. Michl [24], Moseley, Shaikh and Tonak, and Wolff [25] all conclude that the rising ratio of capital to labour was an element in reducing profit rates. This conclusion is an empirical refutation of the Okishio position. “Capital intensive” investments by capitalists aimed at raising their individual competitiveness and profitability have had the effect of causing profitability throughout the economy to fall. Marx’s basic theory is validated.”