Message from @Mr. X

Discord ID: 492436438298787840


2018-09-20 20:44:05 UTC  

i provided evidence against you

2018-09-20 20:44:10 UTC  

and as usual you have an autism attack

2018-09-20 20:44:12 UTC  

No you didnt

2018-09-20 20:44:16 UTC  

and no I didnt

2018-09-20 20:44:45 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/308950154222895104/492435972986765323/image0.jpg

2018-09-20 20:44:52 UTC  

oh that evidence

2018-09-20 20:44:56 UTC  

that's just a graph

2018-09-20 20:45:20 UTC  

fucking nuclear take

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/308950154222895104/492436120483790848/unknown.png

2018-09-20 20:45:20 UTC  

is there atleast a source?

2018-09-20 20:45:42 UTC  

I mean usually when someone provides evidence it needs to be good evidence

2018-09-20 20:45:48 UTC  
2018-09-20 20:45:52 UTC  

Not a good source

2018-09-20 20:45:54 UTC  

“There is general agreement that profit rates fell from the late 1960s until the early 1980s. There is also agreement that profit rates partially recovered after the early 1980s, but with interruptions at the end of the 1980s and the end of the 1990s. There is also an important area of agreement that the fall from the mid-1970s to the early 1980s was not a result of rising wages, since this was the period in which US real wages began a decline which was not partially reversed until the late 1990s. Michl [24], Moseley, Shaikh and Tonak, and Wolff [25] all conclude that the rising ratio of capital to labour was an element in reducing profit rates. This conclusion is an empirical refutation of the Okishio position. “Capital intensive” investments by capitalists aimed at raising their individual competitiveness and profitability have had the effect of causing profitability throughout the economy to fall. Marx’s basic theory is validated.”

2018-09-20 20:46:10 UTC  

marxists.org is an archive site

2018-09-20 20:46:11 UTC  

Give me a better source atleast

2018-09-20 20:46:14 UTC  

Michl, 1988.

2018-09-20 20:46:21 UTC  

they don't write the things they post

2018-09-20 20:46:25 UTC  

Wolff, 2003, pp.479-499

2018-09-20 20:46:30 UTC  

No other marxists do

2018-09-20 20:46:35 UTC  

As in send links

2018-09-20 20:46:46 UTC  

Not names and years

2018-09-20 20:46:49 UTC  

"oh this library is run by a communist so all the books in it are wrong"

2018-09-20 20:46:59 UTC  

not I never said all

2018-09-20 20:47:05 UTC  

its about as credible as cnn

2018-09-20 20:47:09 UTC  

if not less

2018-09-20 20:47:18 UTC  

"this archive is owned by a communist so everything in it must be biased"

2018-09-20 20:47:30 UTC  

Probably if its called marxist.org

2018-09-20 20:47:30 UTC  

@Mr. X “Duménil and Lévy that “the profit rate in 1997” was “still only half of its value of 1948, and between 60 and 75 percent of its average value for the decade 1956-65”. [28]”

2018-09-20 20:47:38 UTC  

Links?

2018-09-20 20:47:42 UTC  

the whole point of an archive is that you store things unchanged

2018-09-20 20:47:42 UTC  

Duménil and Lévy, 2005b.

2018-09-20 20:47:42 UTC  

source?

2018-09-20 20:47:46 UTC  

Duménil and Lévy, 2005b.

2018-09-20 20:47:53 UTC  

That's not a link

2018-09-20 20:48:05 UTC  
2018-09-20 20:48:13 UTC  
2018-09-20 20:48:18 UTC  

that's not a valid source

2018-09-20 20:48:25 UTC  

marxists.org has the information on it

2018-09-20 20:48:33 UTC  

just because it’s hosted on a marxist library doesn’t make it wrong