In slavery you dont get money

and dont benefit

and theres no such thing as wage slavery

The slave is sold once and for all, the proletarian has to sell himself by the day and by the hour. The slave is the property of one master and for that very reason has a guaranteed subsistence, however wretched it may be.

free market

More bullshit again

The proletarian is, so to speak, the slave of the entire bourgeois class, not of one master, and therefore has no guaranteed subsistence, since nobody buys his labour if he does not need it.

you can quit

<:GWfroggyPepoThink:400751114221256705> wtf this is the most blue pilled ramblings Ive ever heard

Denying the liberation of the proletariat is denying freedom itself

The slave is accounted a thing and not a member of civil society.

1st of all, all bullshit
2nd of all humans cant have full freedom, that's not possible

The proletarian is recognised as a person, as a member of civil society.

The slave may, therefore, have a better subsistence than the proletarian but the latter stands at a higher stage of development.

more bullshit, slaves are illegal

more bullshit

The slave frees himself by becoming a proletarian, abolishing from the totality of property relationships only the relationship of slavery. The proletarian can free himself only by abolishing property in general.

That's my argument, now lets see yours.

Again, more bullshit, these slaves do not exist, slavery is illegal

I gave you mine

My argument: The slave is sold once and for all, the proletarian has to sell himself by the day and by the hour. The slave is the property of one master and for that very reason has a guaranteed subsistence, however wretched it may be. The proletarian is, so to speak, the slave of the entire bourgeois class, not of one master, and therefore has no guaranteed subsistence, since nobody buys his labour if he does not need it. The slave is accounted a thing and not a member of civil society. The proletarian is recognised as a person, as a member of civil society. The slave may, therefore, have a better subsistence than the proletarian but the latter stands at a higher stage of development. The slave frees himself by becoming a proletarian, abolishing from the totality of property relationships only the relationship of slavery. The proletarian can free himself only by abolishing property in general.
@Mr. X argument: no slavery doesn't exist and workers don't deserve rights

I told you bluntly that you're delusional and full of bs, which is true

Tldr

Oh wait I've already read it all. I replied clearly

like I said, all your claims here are all bullshit

You must be a troll

and have no basis in reality

I dont troll

Yes you do

No I dont

Ok I'll argue like you do now

I'll go to the irrational form of argument

No, you'll just strawman me

see?

Stop strawmanning my argument

Im not, you proved me right

I'm right, you're stupid

Delusional duck

That's a projection

Stop strawmanning me

Im not