Message from @Mr. X
Discord ID: 506015854140588042
its work
are you a zoomer?
Everything on which their thrones rest is made by the workers' hands.
In many ways, slavery is preferable to wage slavery
And theirs
Not at all
In slavery you dont get money
and dont benefit
and theres no such thing as wage slavery
The slave is sold once and for all, the proletarian has to sell himself by the day and by the hour. The slave is the property of one master and for that very reason has a guaranteed subsistence, however wretched it may be.
free market
More bullshit again
The proletarian is, so to speak, the slave of the entire bourgeois class, not of one master, and therefore has no guaranteed subsistence, since nobody buys his labour if he does not need it.
you can quit
<:GWfroggyPepoThink:400751114221256705> wtf this is the most blue pilled ramblings Ive ever heard
Denying the liberation of the proletariat is denying freedom itself
The slave is accounted a thing and not a member of civil society.
1st of all, all bullshit
2nd of all humans cant have full freedom, that's not possible
The proletarian is recognised as a person, as a member of civil society.
The slave may, therefore, have a better subsistence than the proletarian but the latter stands at a higher stage of development.
more bullshit
The slave frees himself by becoming a proletarian, abolishing from the totality of property relationships only the relationship of slavery. The proletarian can free himself only by abolishing property in general.
That's my argument, now lets see yours.
Again, more bullshit, these slaves do not exist, slavery is illegal
I gave you mine
My argument: The slave is sold once and for all, the proletarian has to sell himself by the day and by the hour. The slave is the property of one master and for that very reason has a guaranteed subsistence, however wretched it may be. The proletarian is, so to speak, the slave of the entire bourgeois class, not of one master, and therefore has no guaranteed subsistence, since nobody buys his labour if he does not need it. The slave is accounted a thing and not a member of civil society. The proletarian is recognised as a person, as a member of civil society. The slave may, therefore, have a better subsistence than the proletarian but the latter stands at a higher stage of development. The slave frees himself by becoming a proletarian, abolishing from the totality of property relationships only the relationship of slavery. The proletarian can free himself only by abolishing property in general.
@Mr. X argument: no slavery doesn't exist and workers don't deserve rights
I told you bluntly that you're delusional and full of bs, which is true
Tldr
Oh wait I've already read it all. I replied clearly
like I said, all your claims here are all bullshit
You must be a troll
and have no basis in reality
I dont troll
Yes you do
No I dont
Ok I'll argue like you do now
I'll go to the irrational form of argument
No, you'll just strawman me
see?
Stop strawmanning my argument