why not do it when they are born

and no

you shut up goat fucker

brb

My thing is, if the family wants to keep it they can

i think babies should be killed

But we should make it morally acceptable to terminate the potentially life of a genetically defective human because the suffering will far out weigh the good things for both sides except in rare cases

upto 10 months

Nonsense, suffering is a part of life

Wtf are you guys talking about

your mother

Are you guys really that retarded

I haven’t disagreed with that statement. I said that the life of a mentally retarded or genetically deficient persons and their caretakers will have exceptionally more suffering for all parties involved than the average and therefore that necessitates that morality of this case must be considered and allowed

Throw them to the Lions at the zoo then

and you're a fortune teller how? @Deleted User

@Forerunner Vladimir no, youre retarded here.

Shut up you fat fuck

Said the poorfag who lives on 1$ mcdonald burgers

No I eat at longhorn steakhouse everyday dumbass

Mr. E. If you don’t want me to treat you like a retard stop acting like one.

That’s not an argument.

Nah dude, you spelled mcdonalds wrong

@Deleted User yeah it is

how do you know that a baby is going to grow up too ineffective?

especially before its born

and why is it only justified before its born?

@Mr. X waat

social conditions affect the future of a child

dummy

or should i say 'socioeconomic'

Yes and? Neither is unchanging dumbass.

lmao

yes it does

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vKZPgGbUuX0

Genetically it’s possible to see if a baby will have chromosomal defects or other possible malfunctions like Down syndrome

good to know

@Mr. X Love you bb

@Deleted User

Ok