Message from @Barpy
Discord ID: 526246902597943326
not ancap
@Borzo come down here mate
but people were killed in order to create communism where people werent killed in order to create capitalism
lol
@Barpy exactly
communism is inherently violent
@Barpy You mean like the killing of the Kulaks? Of course.
These were private property owners who wouldn't give up what they held.
They owned farms they kept to themselves and held onto it rather than socializing them.
Catherine Braithewaite ^
Exactly
Catherine Braithewaite
RDR2?
Tobacco fields
Kulaks to the gulags
Yep
Dutch was an ancap
We cannot let the rich continue to maintain the power they have and just let them horde wealth.
>Kulaks would hoard all the food, starving the whole country
>stalin deals with the kulaks
>stalin gets blamed for the famine AND killing kulaks
Trobbed?
>When you get your political ideology from a game
No, they were robbing us.
robbed*
Keeping the food and money to themselves.
Dutch Van Der Linde opposed the state and wanted the hard working to earn rather than the unemployed
Capitalism robs the working class of its labour value
If we're going to redistribute resource, we cannot let people hold onto more than they need.
but they worked much harder to get the food instead of people that did nothing
No, they didn't. They had workers do the work for them.
>kulaks work
@TheTeacher No they didn't
No "proletarian" starts from nothing and can somehow afford workers to start off their business
still, they worked their way up, where with communism, people that work hard will get robbed and people that do nothing get free stuff
Sort of like how you think Steve Jobs did all the work to make the iPhone, but you ignore the fact he took a ton of public sector shit, ignore the Chinese kid who made it, and ignore the African in the Congo who mined the minerals to build the phone up.
They did not you liar
They had to work their way up to get workers and become "bourgeoisie" in the first place
dumbass
No man is an island.