Message from @Musketar (Alex)
Discord ID: 527609358717157377
Social democrats
@PugSlugger ok why they shoot revolutionary workers and shoot communists from Union of Spartakus?
The SPD was established as a Marxist party in 1875. However, the Social Democrats underwent a major shift in policies reflected in the differences between the Heidelberg Program of 1925 which "called for the transformation of the capitalist system of private ownership of the means of production to social ownership"[11] and the Godesberg Program of 1959 which aimed to broaden its voter base and move its political position toward the centre.[12]
😩
Cry more
@PugSlugger are you fucking retarded
Kerensky, a social democrat, feared a socialist revolution, which was seen in October
Any source on that?
"And I can understand how you like and trust and put your hope in Kerensky. You want to give him time, a chance, to act. He means well, you say. He means socialism. But I warn you he will not make socialism. He may think socialism, he may mean socialism. But, comrades -- I tell you Kerensky is an intellectual: he cannot act; he can talk; he cannot act. But you will not believe this yet. You will take time to give him time, and meanwhile, like Kerensky, you will not work. Very well, take your time. But when the hour strikes, when you are ready to go back yourselves to work and you want a government that will go to work and not only think socialism and talk socialism and mean socialism -- when you want a government that will do socialism, then -- come to the Bolsheviki" Lenin
>when you advocate for social ownership but youre not real socialists because you failed
<:bour:313709044957315082>
Yes it was established with participation of marxists but in German SPD always was bourgeois, opportunist tendency like Bernstein, Kautsky and so on who became anticommunists and antimarxists
>when you uphold capitalism while pretending to be socialist
You guys really like to say that all these failed socialists arent REAAAL socialists
Like venezuela
Laos
Weimar republic
Laos is not failed
Oh they arent reallll
Weimar Republic is capitalist
This tendency won in 1914 when 2nd Intenational collapsed because socdems became fucking social-chovinists supported imperialist government
Venezuela is third world Scandinavia
And yet it was run by socialists attempting to make it socialist
>When you have 70% of your industry privatised but right wingers think your socialist
Lads just move on
@PugSlugger show me what was "socialist" in Weimar republic in economy?
Youre trying to revive a been there done that trash ideology
Its centuries old
Put it to bed
@PugSlugger trash is here you)
Socialism is when da government does stuff. The more stuff it does, the more socialister it is
Strawman and no true scotsman at once
The left truely cant debate
The right can't fight
And the right can't identify fallacies
@PugSlugger because fucking right discurs can't see actual basement of socialism if you try to find it in phrases then you see the same communists and social democrats in Weimar republic)
Hitler was "socialist" too probably he was marxist?
Venezuela was variant of anti-imperialist struggle, they used socialist phraseology but this wasn't never a scientific criteria of socialism because socialism is about socialization of means of production, dictatorship of the proletariat in different forms (Soviet power or people's democracy). They cancelled to provide any communist measures and tryed to keep capitalism that's why they failed in fact instead devolepment of revolutionary process they remained on point of bourgeois economy and nationalization didn't became a point to socialization means of production.