Message from @Borzo
Discord ID: 530694673816223744
Feudalism > Capitalism
people who think nazis were socialist or capitalist are dumb don't @ me
@Borzo Fuck capitalis
How so?
Feudalism was better
What says it isn't?
Are you a feudal socialist? @Deleted User
A lot of indigenous people from countries practiced cannibalism
Im a theocrat
That's because there's no need for it
and artificial morals
"I can find half human apes that do it!!!!"
but in a famine, cannibalism is perfectly natural
same situation as in the wild
Owing to their historical position, it became the vocation of the aristocracies of France and England to write pamphlets against modern bourgeois society. In the French Revolution of July 1830, and in the English reform agitation[A], these aristocracies again succumbed to the hateful upstart. Thenceforth, a serious political struggle was altogether out of the question. A literary battle alone remained possible. But even in the domain of literature the old cries of the restoration period had become impossible.
@Mr. X We need iran but christian
Yes it is
you just said primitive people did it
In order to arouse sympathy, the aristocracy was obliged to lose sight, apparently, of its own interests, and to formulate their indictment against the bourgeoisie in the interest of the exploited working class alone. Thus, the aristocracy took their revenge by singing lampoons on their new masters and whispering in his ears sinister prophesies of coming catastrophe.
Than we have achieved utopia
primitive people were in a state of chronic malnutrition
In this way arose feudal Socialism: half lamentation, half lampoon; half an echo of the past, half menace of the future; at times, by its bitter, witty and incisive criticism, striking the bourgeoisie to the very heart’s core; but always ludicrous in its effect, through total incapacity to comprehend the march of modern history.
It is if you're starving
to want to cannibalise
Yes it is
You don't starve because you're a petty bourgeois
@Deleted User The aristocracy, in order to rally the people to them, waved the proletarian alms-bag in front for a banner. But the people, so often as it joined them, saw on their hindquarters the old feudal coats of arms, and deserted with loud and irreverent laughter.
In pointing out that their mode of exploitation was different to that of the bourgeoisie, the feudalists forget that they exploited under circumstances and conditions that were quite different and that are now antiquated. In showing that, under their rule, the modern proletariat never existed, they forget that the modern bourgeoisie is the necessary offspring of their own form of society.
@Mr. X Then they're dumb
They deserve to die
if they won't cannibalise
For the rest, so little do they conceal the reactionary character of their criticism that their chief accusation against the bourgeois amounts to this, that under the bourgeois régime a class is being developed which is destined to cut up root and branch the old order of society.
@Buy me a pc you a might is right nigger
@Deleted User What they upbraid the bourgeoisie with is not so much that it creates a proletariat as that it creates a revolutionary proletariat.
@Mmph ik
why shouldnt I rape you
In political practice, therefore, they join in all coercive measures against the working class; and in ordinary life, despite their high-falutin phrases, they stoop to pick up the golden apples dropped from the tree of industry, and to barter truth, love, and honour, for traffic in wool, beetroot-sugar, and potato spirits.
The worker would be better off if we followed a biblical for of socialis
Because