Message from @The Great Unclean One

Discord ID: 542427083104845834


2019-02-05 18:27:13 UTC  

Who wants to kill some jews

2019-02-05 18:40:57 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/308950154222895104/542414345573892113/image0.jpg

2019-02-05 18:41:45 UTC  

Let’s get some Jews

2019-02-05 18:42:24 UTC  

approved

2019-02-05 19:30:18 UTC  

@Overpaid one cannot agree with pol pot ideology

2019-02-05 19:30:23 UTC  

ho chi minh theory

2019-02-05 19:30:31 UTC  

and maoism

2019-02-05 19:30:34 UTC  

>Pol pot

2019-02-05 19:30:36 UTC  

at the same time

2019-02-05 19:31:04 UTC  

maoist and ho chi minh

2019-02-05 19:31:06 UTC  

GUYS

2019-02-05 19:31:10 UTC  

kinda compatable

2019-02-05 19:31:13 UTC  

IS DEAD

2019-02-05 19:31:18 UTC  

wait

2019-02-05 19:31:18 UTC  

RIP

2019-02-05 19:31:19 UTC  

really

2019-02-05 19:31:28 UTC  

time to host a 3 year morning period

2019-02-05 19:31:34 UTC  

when he die

2019-02-05 19:31:35 UTC  

like

2019-02-05 19:31:37 UTC  

RIP @ho chi meme

2019-02-05 19:31:38 UTC  

2051?

2019-02-05 19:34:35 UTC  

you're being discriminory

2019-02-05 19:35:39 UTC  

and i dont like your timbre

2019-02-05 19:37:27 UTC  

pol pot was too government debased for it to work with ho chi minh theory

2019-02-05 19:37:30 UTC  

maoism

2019-02-05 19:37:33 UTC  

is fine

2019-02-05 19:37:51 UTC  

but pol pot doesn't work with maoism or ho chi minh

2019-02-05 19:37:57 UTC  

these are my thoughts tho

2019-02-05 19:39:29 UTC  

i like the killing fields aspect

2019-02-05 19:41:40 UTC  

Hi

2019-02-05 19:41:41 UTC  

Hi

2019-02-05 19:41:43 UTC  

Hi

2019-02-05 19:48:26 UTC  

hi

2019-02-05 19:53:24 UTC  
2019-02-05 20:00:36 UTC  

sounded good before the techno kicked in

2019-02-05 20:13:10 UTC  

Fite me

2019-02-05 21:06:27 UTC  

Well guys, I did it. I finally read the book *Revolt Against the Modern World* and it fucking sucked. It felt like if Hitler wrote Mein Kampf while he was high on weed. It had this weird mythological and romanticized version of the past as if the "old traditions" were better than what we have now. Yet it picked and chose traditions of the past rather than taking the past as a whole. It had that idea of the past being tinted with the values that we have now. It made me think a lot of how Focault saw the past. As more an argument than a truly materialistic and objective view of the past. We cannot return to the old ways because we don't really have a good view of the past. If you want to return to old traditions... you can't. It is literally impossible.

2019-02-05 21:10:56 UTC  

Seriously, I'd call it Fascist Mysticism. It didn't have any material arguments to make, but just a whole slew of mystical and spiritual arguments. It feels simultaneously easy and hard to argue against it because it's basis is in the "transcendental" rather than anything else. I can dispel it by saying that has no real basis in reality, but for the mysticist, who fucking cares? This idea of the past as when we were more spiritually pure is just an argument from emotion. He felt the past was better, but all he bases it off of is... well, spiritual bullshit.